Unless you’re a developer or someone who will work in a JavaScript library, it’s likely you haven’t given much thought to what JavaScript library to use. The problem here is that JavaScript is a very dynamic and loosely coupled environment. You could easily use JavaScript in an embedded web page, a Java servlet, or even as an HTML application.

Being an experienced JavaScript developer, I’m often asked to recommend one JavaScript library to use in various situations, like the complex interface that powers all the casinos features on the official new casino 2020 list. However, there are only three situations in which I recommend JavaScript:

Models with a number of objects and a set of function calls;

A flowchart application;

Managing and performing dynamic document editing, without going into complicated server side logic.

I wouldn’t advise developing one application in JavaScript, then trying to use JavaScript libraries in a different application.

What About Other Components?

I could understand if you wanted to use jQuery or jQuery plugins in your application. Then, of course, you’d also need to select a cross browser browser as well.

It’s good to be aware of JavaScript frameworks too, like jQuery, Mootools, jQuery UI and VelocityJS. Each of these frameworks have their own set of tools to help you develop cross browser applications, such as tools for managing strings and arrays, cross browser fonts, CSS (css/scss) for both performance and accessibility, and JavaScript code obfuscation tools.

While I still consider myself a JavaScript developer, it would not hurt to spend some time researching these JavaScript libraries as well. It’s good to know what all these JavaScript libraries are capable of, and if you’re not interested in one, that’s okay too.

Which JavaScript Library Is the Best?

I recommend any application that has a clear purpose, such as building applications that follow a certain API design, or using a specific algorithm for processing data. In such applications, I’m more interested in getting things done quickly than looking up all the libraries for my application to work with.

For example, when it comes to JavaScript libraries, I am much more interested in a framework that simplifies writing Java code into JavaScript code than using another framework, which I find cumbersome.

This is just me. What about you?

JavaScript Libraries

Take the following code from the href==path==showTheLinksAll(); method. I suggest dropping the parentheses around the variables as your application grows.

.linkTo(document.documentElement) .linkTo(window.contentLinksContainer) .then(function(linkUrl){ return linkUrl; }) .findAll({ item: ‘<div></div>’ }).forEach(function(linkUrl){ linkUrl = linkUrl.replace(/[%=]|<\/([^>]+|<\/=])/g, ‘<div/>’) })

Let’s call that javascript. I could try other libraries for speed, speed, speed, but in most cases, after looking at their documentation, it comes down to how much you actually use the library.

There are many other libraries out there, such as Angular, jQuery, and React, and the full list is over 5,000, so I’ll just leave that to the whims of the developers. If I had to choose, I’d go with Angular and React for a simple app or jQuery for something more complex. You could use any library. No doubt there are a million more I’m missing.

Conclusion

This may sound like a laundry list of solutions, but in the end, the goal is the same: Take your code from something that needs an external dependency, like jQuery or Angular, and make it more efficient with an external library.

The example code uses Caffeine for its efficiency, but you can find the code on GitHub.

The API is public for two reasons. One, to get feedback from developers that have to work with this code in a real world environment, and two, to publish a library, so that when you’re working on a new project, you can pick up a library that’s already solved that particular problem and write code that’s more efficient.